On July 2, we reported on Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins’ ruling that multimedia rights companies (MMRs) and third-party brand sponsors are not categorically excluded from the definition of “associated entities” under the House settlement. On August 4, U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken affirmed that ruling, upholding the College Sports Commission’s (CSC) authority to review NIL deals between NCAA athletes and MMRs or third-party brand sponsors.
Callan G. Stein
Cal's broad litigation and investigation practice encompasses white collar criminal matters, corporate and commercial civil litigation, internal investigations, and health care litigation. Cal frequently represents and advises higher education clients, particularly in areas related to collegiate athletics and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights and compliance. Cal provides NIL compliance advice and internal investigation services to major universities, including those that participate in Division I football and basketball, and likewise advises schools on athletics contracts, conference affiliations, conference realignment, and other NCAA-related issues. Cal also represents and advises businesses on NIL contracts, as well as NIL collectives on formation and compliance matters. Cal hosts the firm's "Highway to NIL" podcast that discusses the legal landscape and developments in the area of NIL law.
CSC Approves Reworked $7.5M Deals for Nebraska Student-Athletes
On July 29, 2026, Nebraska’s athletic director announced that the College Sports Commission (CSC) had approved a restructured set of NIL deals for the same 18 Nebraska football players whose deals were arbitrated, totaling $7.5 million — the same dollar amount as the agreements the CSC previously denied. As discussed in our prior post, “The Great Divide Post-House: CSC Enforcement and the Power Four Conferences,” Arbitrator Andrew M. Strongin issued a binding May 11, 2026, ruling upholding the CSC’s denial of $7.5 million in NIL deals structured through Nebraska’s exclusive multimedia rights (MMR) partner.
Stanford Football and the Next Phase of College Sports Labor Rights
On July 27, 2026, Stanford University football players took a notable step in the continuing transformation of college athletics. The team became the first college football program to form a current, player-led chapter of the College Football Players Association (CFBPA), an organization advocating for player representation, collective bargaining, and improved protections for college football players. Stanford’s announcement is significant not because a union is imminent, but because it suggests that NIL, revenue sharing, and collective bargaining may now be moving toward the same legal and commercial conversation.
NCAA Division I Cabinet Approves Age-Based, Five-Year Eligibility Model
On June 23, 2026, the NCAA Division I Cabinet unanimously approved a historic overhaul of student-athlete eligibility rules, adopting an age-based model that grants student-athletes five full seasons of competition after entering college. The vote marks the most significant structural change to NCAA eligibility rules in decades and resolves — at least formally — a system that had become both legally vulnerable and administratively unworkable.
NCAA Tampering Probe Puts Revenue-Sharing Era Under the Microscope
Last week, the NCAA launched a forensic investigation into the University of Mississippi (Ole Miss) football program following public complaints alleging potential tampering involving linebacker Luke Ferrelli. Ferrelli, the ACC Defensive Rookie of the Year as a member of the University of California, Berkeley during the 2025 season, entered the transfer portal this offseason, signed a revenue-sharing contract with Clemson, then later reentered the portal and ultimately transferred to Ole Miss.
‘Urgent National Action to Save College Sports’: Trump’s NIL Playbook
In this episode of Highway to NIL, Troutman Pepper Locke attorneys Cal Stein and Mike Lowe break down President Donald Trump’s executive order, “Urgent National Action to Save College Sports.” Cal and Mike unpack the order’s call for a national NIL framework, proposed five-year eligibility caps and transfer limits, protections for women’s and Olympic sports, tighter rules on tampering and “fraudulent” NIL deals, and the directive to challenge state laws that conflict with interstate college sports governance.
‘Desk Drawer Roundup’: NIL Contract Fights, Eligibility Battles, and the CSC Participation Agreement
In this episode of Highway to NIL, Troutman Pepper Locke attorney Cal Stein is joined by colleagues Mike Lowe, Philip Nickerson, George Pla, and Derek Centola for a “desk drawer” tour through some of the most consequential recent developments in NIL and college sports. The group unpacks a wave of NIL contract disputes involving high-value athletes, the escalating legal fights over eligibility and the five-year rule, and the emerging governance battles around the College Sports Commission’s (CSC) participation agreement.
CSC Notifies LSU and Other Schools of Investigations Into Potential NIL Deal-Reporting Violations
Just weeks ago, we reported that the College Sports Commission (CSC) would be ramping up investigations into unreported third-party NIL agreements. The CSC has since made good on that promise. On January 30, The Athletic reported that Louisiana State University’s (LSU) athletic director, Verge Ausberry, received an email from the CSC’s head of investigations, Katie B. Medearis, informing the institution that they were under investigation regarding potential failure to report multiple third-party NIL deals.
Beyond the Deals: Student-Athlete Identity, Development, and NIL With 42U’s Stephen Bienko
In this episode of Highway to NIL, Troutman Pepper Locke attorneys Cal Stein and Chris Brolley are joined by 42U CEO and former Division I student-athlete Stephen Bienko to discuss how NIL is reshaping college sports from the inside out. Stephen explains how 42U helps athletes understand their identity, decision-making, and long-term goals rather than chasing one-off NIL deals. The conversation explores how Power Four and mid-major programs are building NIL infrastructures, why women’s and Olympic sports may offer the greatest growth opportunity, how student-athlete expectations have evolved since the early days of NIL, and how regulatory and compliance uncertainty is affecting administrators and athletes alike.
This Is SPARTA: The FTC’s Formal Inquiry and a Sea Change in Federal Oversight of College Sports Agents
Key Takeaway:
After decades of minimal federal activity, the Sports Agent Responsibility and Trust Act (SPARTA) is drawing renewed attention. A January 2026 Federal Trade Commission (FTC) inquiry into sports agent practices may signal a meaningful shift in enforcement — particularly in the NIL era.